ABSTRACT
Objective:To determine the effects of menopausal stage, age and other associated risk factors on symptoms of anxiety and depression among women in a community in Beijing.Methods:This study was a community-based prospective cohort. Participants who had transitioned through natural menopause, completed two or more depressive and anxiety symptoms evaluations, aged 35 to 64 years, and did not use hormone therapy were selected from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital aging longitudinal cohort of women in midlife to this analysis. The primary outcome variables were depressive and anxiety symptoms, assessed by hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). The generalized estimation equation was used in the statistical analysis.Results:Followed up from 2006 to 2014, 430 women and 2 533 HADS assessments were retained in the cohort. Depressive symptoms were more common than anxiety symptoms during all menopausal stages. The incidences of depressive and anxiety symptoms were 14.5% (19/191) and 3.1% (4/191) in the premenopausal -3 stage, respectively. The incidence increased in both menopausal transition and postmenopausal stage, with the highest incidence in the +1c stage [20.6% (155/751) and 8.8% (66/751), respectively]. However, these differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Depressive symptoms were highest in the ≥60-<65 age group [20.8% (74/355)], and anxiety symptoms were highest in the ≥50-<55 age group [8.2% (62/754)]; but there were no statistical significances between different age groups and depressive and anxiety symptoms (all P>0.05). Multivariable analysis showed that high body mass index, low education status, and poor health status were independently associated with depressive symptoms (all P<0.05), and that poor health status, trouble falling asleep, and early awakening were independently associated with anxiety symptoms (all P<0.01). Conclusions:Depressive and anxiety symptoms are more common during menopausal transition and postmenopausal stage compared with reproductive stage. Depressive symptoms are more common than anxiety symptoms. To screen and assess depressive and anxiety symptoms in perimenopausal women is essential, especially for women with high risk factors.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To reappraise systematic review/Meta-analysis （SRs/MAs）of the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide 1（GLP-1）receptor agonist in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus （T2DM），and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical use of these drugs in the treatment of T 2DM. METHODS ：Retireved from Cochrane library ，PubMed，Embase，CBM， Wanfang database and CNKI ，systematic review/Me ta-analysis about GLP- 1 receptor agonist in the treatment of T 2DM were collected during the inception to Dec. 2019. After data extraction of literatures met inclusion and exclusion criteria ，GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence included in the study ，and the evidence of efficacy and safety outcome indexes were summarized. RESULTS ：Finally 31 literatures were included ，involving 91 outcome indexes ，and GRADE evidence quality was medium，among which 4（4.4％）were very-low-quality ，33（36.3％）were low-quality ，45（49.5％）were medium-quality ，and 9 （9.9％）were high-quality outcome indicators. The results of evidence summary showed that GLP- 1 receptor agonists were better than or similar to placebo and other oral hypoglycemic drugs ， better than dipeptidyl peptidase 4 （DPP-4） inhibitors in . reducing the level of HbA 1c；better than or similar to placebo ， JDZX2015240） better than other oral hypoglycemic agents and DPP- 4 2276299207@qq.com inhibitors in reducing the level of fasting glucose ；similar to DDP-4 inhibitors，higher than or similar to placebo ，lower than other oral hypoglycemic dru gs in the incidence of hypoglycemia；higher than other oral hypoglycemic drugs ，placebo and DPP- 4 inhibitors in the incidence of diarrhea and nausea ； higher than other oral hypoglycemic drugs and placebo in the incidence of vomiting. CONCLUSIONS ：The evidence quality of systematic review/Meta-analysis about GLP- 1 receptor agonist in the treatment of T 2DM are moderate. These drugs have good clinical efficacy in the treatment of T 2DM，but their safety are not as good as placebo or other oral hypoglycemic drugs.